Calls for a change in eligibility rules regarding the AFL's Mark and Goal of the Year awards are growing following an exceptional play by Sydney's Isaac Heeney during the qualifying final against GWS. Despite his stunning performance, Heeney's mark will not be considered for the annual awards.

AFL Faces Backlash Over Mark of the Year Rules After Isaac Heeney's Stunning Final Performance

Calls for Rule Revisions Gaining Momentum

Following Heeney's incredible catch that left commentators and fans in awe, there has been a surge in demands to extend the eligibility for the mark and goal of the year awards to include finals performances. Heeney's breathtaking jump over Jack Buckley showcased his elite skill and has led commentators to voice their frustrations about the current rules.

Noteworthy Commentary on Heeney's Performance

The Channel 7 commentary team expressed amazement at Heeney's mark, with Jason Bennett exclaiming, "He got the ultimate ride. Doing everything to lift his team." Matthew Richardson, a Richmond great, emphasized the significance of the mark, calling it "an absolute old-fashioned hanger." Such excitement from experts highlights the recognition Heeney deserves, despite the mark's exclusion from the year-end awards.

The Inadequacy of Current Award Criteria

The AFL has specified that only marks and goals from the regular season are eligible for these prestigious awards. This decision also excludes impressive plays from players like Jeremy Cameron, whose remarkable goal during Geelong's victory over Port Adelaide will not be competing for the recognition it merits. Richardson condemned the ruling, stating, "It's just nonsense," arguing that the season should be considered complete only at the conclusion of the grand final.

Finalists Announced Amid Controversy

Recently, the AFL revealed the three finalists for each award, with Nick Daicos nominated for goal of the year twice, alongside Harley Reid. Other nominees for the best mark include Collingwood players Bobby Hill and Jamie Elliott, as well as young star Zane Duursma from North Melbourne. Commentator Kate McCarthy questioned the rationale behind the exclusion of finals plays, labeling Heeney and Cameron as "robbed" of their rightful recognition.

Potential Losses Beyond Recognition

Exclusion from the awards not only affects the legacy of players like Heeney and Cameron but also means a missed opportunity for a $50,000 cash prize associated with winning these awards. Journalist Daniel Cherny noted the irony that the awards are named after players who achieved their iconic moments in grand finals, drawing attention to the inconsistency in the current eligibility criteria.

Heeney's Reflections on the Remarkable Play

In the aftermath of his spectacular mark, Heeney expressed gratitude to Buckley for preventing what could have been a serious fall. He noted the rarity of such plays this season, stating, "I haven't really taken one all year, but it felt alright." Heeney acknowledged that Buckley's contact prevented a potentially dangerous landing, showcasing both his humility and awareness of the risks involved in such aerial feats.