Elle Macpherson's Alternative Treatment Claims Draw Backlash from Breast Cancer Survivors
Elle Macpherson's claim that she overcame breast cancer by rejecting conventional treatment has sparked outrage among survivors. Many express anger, stating such views are harmful and misleading. Medical professionals warn that ignoring standard care can lead to severe consequences, emphasising the risks associated with alternative therapies.
Breast cancer survivors have expressed their anger towards supermodel Elle Macpherson following her controversial claims about overcoming the disease through alternative therapies. In light of her statements, medical professionals caution about the risks associated with her approach.
Elle Macpherson’s Controversial Treatment Choices
In a recent interview, Elle Macpherson disclosed her decision to forego traditional medical treatments following her 2017 diagnosis of HER2-positive oestrogen receptive intraductal carcinoma. Instead of heeding the advice of 32 doctors advising surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, the 60-year-old opted for what she described as a "holistic approach," which included an eight-month stay in Phoenix, Arizona. Macpherson has reported being in clinical remission, asserting her "utter wellness." However, this claim has been met with significant backlash.
Medical Community Responds to Macpherson’s Claims
Medical professionals have voiced strong concerns regarding Macpherson's treatment choices. Dr Cindy Mak, a breast cancer surgeon, highlighted the catastrophic consequences faced by patients who have followed similar paths. Mak emphasised that while seven years post-diagnosis is favourable, it does not conclusively signify safety, suggesting that long-term outcomes remain uncertain. Macpherson's approach has alarmed cancer specialists, with Dr David Robert Grimes labelling it "incredibly irresponsible" and asserting that holistic treatments lack validity in cancer care.
Impact on Cancer Survivors
Survivors of breast cancer have articulated feelings of disbelief and frustration towards Macpherson’s statements. Patrice Capogreco remarked on the disparity in access to healthcare advice, particularly highlighting the privilege of Macpherson's multimillionaire status that allows her such options. The Cancer Council has reiterated that alternative therapies lack scientific backing and caution against their use in place of conventional treatments. Their position underscores the potential harm these unproven therapies can inflict on patients trying to combat cancer.
Expert Opinions on Appropriate Treatments
Experts like Dr Chris Pyke have commented on the nature of Macpherson's initial condition, noting that a lumpectomy can be an acceptable treatment for HER2-positive oestrogen-receptive intraductal carcinoma. While acknowledging that some cases may become invasive if inadequately treated, he stated that the likelihood of progression remains low. He asserted that removing the lump alone might have been sufficient in Macpherson's case, yet reiterated the necessity of close monitoring to ensure patient safety.
